• Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • mThink Digital
  • Thought Leadership
    • White Papers
  • About
    • Content Marketing
    • Content Strategy
      • Web Content
      • Social Media Strategy
      • Webinars & Video
      • Thought Leadership
    • Performance Marketing
    • Portfolio
      • Revenue Performance
      • Accenture
      • Microsoft
      • Java Detour
      • Our Process
    • Contact Us

mThink

Blue Book Logo

BlueBook Logo

The Trusted Name in Performance Marketing

ROS Leaderboard

  • Home
  • Blue Book
    • About Blue Book
    • Blue Ribbon Panel
    • Interviews
    • Research Methodology
    • Back Issues
    • Advertising
      • Website Creative Specifications
      • Newsletter Creative Specifications
  • Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • Best European CPA Networks
  • Best CPA Networks for Affiliates
  • Best CPA Networks for Advertisers

FTC and U.S. Chamber of Commerce Fight About Section 13(b) of the FTC Act

May 26, 2021 by Richard B. Newman

Following a hearing in the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation last month, Federal Trade Commission Acting Chairwoman Rebecca Kelly Slaughter wrote to the Committee regarding the FTC’s position that the ability of the agency to return money unlawfully taken from consumers should be restored.  The aforementioned Congressional Committee is currently working on draft language for a new Section 13(b) of the FTC Act.

Acting Chairwoman Slaughter’s letter was written in response to a letter from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce regarding the Commission’s ability to use Section 13(b) of the FTC Act to seek consumer compensation in antitrust and consumer protection cases.  The Chamber’s letter notes that the legislative history of the FTC Act requires the FTC to use Section 19’s administrative processes to obtain monetary relief for past violations, and that monetary relief should be reserved for the most egregious types of cases.

In short, Acting Chairwoman Slaughter’s letter explains that the Chamber’s argument against legislation to restore the FTC’s authority is based on fundamental misunderstandings of the history of Section 13(b) which, in 2020 alone, resulted in more than $483 million in refunds to consumers who lost money due to alleged unlawful conduct.  Specifically, the letter explains that the Chamber’s proposals would allow companies and individuals to keep the gains they earned from breaking the law, hurt honest competitors who did not break the law, and leave consumers who suffered losses out in the cold.

On April 22, 2021, the Supreme Court ruled the FTC lacks authority under Section 13(b) to seek monetary relief in federal court.  According to a unanimous Court, “[t]he Commission may obtain monetary relief by first invoking its administrative procedures and then § 19’s redress provisions . . . By contrast, the Commission’s broad reading would allow it to use §13(b) as a substitute for §5 and §19.”

The Commission has urged Congress to restore the FTC’s ability to get money back for consumers as it has over the past four decades in a wide variety of cases, including telemarketing fraud, anticompetitive pharmaceutical practices, data security and privacy, scams that target seniors and veterans, and deceptive business practices, among many others.

In her letter, the Acting Chairwoman reiterated her support for legislation to swiftly restore Section 13(b) and preserve the FTC’s ability to enjoin illegal conduct, disgorge ill-gotten gains, and return to consumers money they have lost.

It will be interesting to see if Congress decides that the FTC should be able to use Section 13(b) to pursue monetary and injunctive relief for all violations, regardless of whether they occurred in the past, they are ongoing or they are imminent, or whether the Chamber’s view that monetary relief should be available only for clearly fraudulent cases that are found to be in violation of the law.

Consult with an experienced FTC lawyer if you are interested in discussing applicable claim substantiation requirements and FTC regulatory policy.

Richard B. Newman is an FTC defense attorney at Hinch Newman LLP. Follow FTC defense lawyer on National Law Review.  

Attorney advertising. Informational purposes only. Not legal advice.

Related posts:

  1. FTC Obtains Court Order Banning Alleged Work-From-Home Scammer from Selling Business Opportunities and Using Robocalls The Federal Trade Commission has announced that it has permanently...
  2. DoJ Announces Historic Civil Penalty in a Telemarketing Enforcement Action The Department of Justice has announced a settlement in which...
  3. FTC Settles Charges Against Online Investment Training Program Providers While Doubts About the Scope of FTC Enforcement Authority Loom As previously blogged about here, providers of online training and...
  4. Court Addresses Unconstitutional TCPA Damages and Who Can be Held Liable A company that managed the ownership rights of a film...

Filed Under: Blue Book, Revenue, Revenue Blog Tagged With: Chamber of Commerce, FTC, Ftc attorney, FTC Compliance

Search

ROS Col 2 Top

ROS Col 2 Mid

ROS Col 2 Low

Subscribe to our newsletter!

* indicates required

ROS Col 2 – 4 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 5 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 6 Misc

Recent Posts

  • Why The Speed of Relevance Can Help You Win
  • Why Should Marketers Invest In Pay Per Call?
  • CFPB Issues Warning About Contractual Gag Clauses and Consumer Reviews
  • New Blue Book Top 20 CPS Affiliate Network Results
  • FTC Rules With Civil Monetary Penalties for Deceptive Earnings Claims and Targeted Marketing May Be Forthcoming
  • New Blue Book Results: Top 20 CPA Affiliate Networks For 2022
  • FTC Rules With Civil Monetary Penalties for Deceptive Earnings Claims and Targeted Marketing May Be Forthcoming
  • Top 4 Ways To Make Your Call Campaigns More Successful
  • Perform[cb]’s New Mobile App For Partners Is A Game Changer
  • Shaping the Perfect Matchmaker for Content Creators
  • Removing Barriers for Influencers and Content Creators
  • 8 Easy Ways To Refresh An Email Campaign
  • CEO Interview: Dynu In Media
  • Interview with Rakuten’s CRO Jeff Wender
  • CPA MarTech Year In Review 2021

About mThink

mThink is a specialist digital marketing company based in San Francisco. We focus on media buying, Facebook marketing, direct response, social and mobile. In addition mThink produces the annual Blue Book Rankings of major performance marketing networks. Read More »

Baseboard

Copyright ©2022 · mThink. All rights reserved.
3053 Fillmore Street, Suite 325 | (415) 787-0250
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy