• Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • mThink Digital
  • Thought Leadership
    • White Papers
  • About
    • Content Marketing
    • Content Strategy
      • Web Content
      • Social Media Strategy
      • Webinars & Video
      • Thought Leadership
    • Performance Marketing
    • Portfolio
      • Revenue Performance
      • Accenture
      • Microsoft
      • Java Detour
      • Our Process
    • Contact Us

mThink

Blue Book Logo

BlueBook Logo

The Trusted Name in Performance Marketing

ROS Leaderboard

  • Home
  • Blue Book
    • About Blue Book
    • Blue Ribbon Panel
    • Interviews
    • Research Methodology
    • Back Issues
    • Advertising
      • Website Creative Specifications
      • Newsletter Creative Specifications
  • Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • Best European CPA Networks
  • Best CPA Networks for Affiliates
  • Best CPA Networks for Advertisers

Federal Court Holds TCPA Plaintiff Did Not Adequately Allege ATDS

July 2, 2019 by Richard B. Newman

In Bader v. Navient Solutions, LLC (N.D. Ill. June 14, 2019), the North District of Illinois dismissed a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) plaintiff’s claims on the basis that the complaint did not possesses sufficient facts to plausibly allege the defendant had used an automated telephone dialing system (ATDS), consistent with post-ACA International v. Federal Communications Commission standards.

In ACA International, the D.C. Circuit reviewed a 2015 FCC order that interpreted the TCPA’s prohibition against using automated dialing devices to make unsolicited calls to cellular telephones.  The court set aside two portions of the 2015 Order and confirmed two others.

In its decision, the court set aside: (i) the 2015 Order’s “expansive” definition of an ATDS; and (ii) the Order’s “one-call safe harbor” exemption for reassigned wireless phone numbers.

However, the court confirmed the Order’s approach to revocation of consent under the TCPA (a person may revoke prior consent through “any reasonable means clearly expressing a desire to receive no further messages from the caller”) and the scope of the Order’s exemption for time-sensitive health care calls.

In Bader, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant violated the TCPA when it called his telephone more than 100 times in an attempt to collect a third-party’s student loan debt.  The plaintiff further alleged that he “experiences a noticeable pause, lasting approximately four to five seconds in length, before [he] is connected with a live representative.”  The plaintiff concluded that this is indicative of the use of predictive dialing technology.

The court agreed with the defendant’s argument that the plaintiff failed to allege facts establishing that it “used a device that had the ability to generate random or sequential numbers and dial such numbers.”

Despite the plaintiff’s allegations that the “continual calling, even after being told that he was not the person [the defendant] was seeking,” the court opined that under the post-ACA International  threshold, plaintiffs must plead and prove that dialing equipment can: (i) generate numbers, either randomly or sequentially; and (ii) dial such numbers.

Because the plaintiff had not done so here, the court dismissed the case.

Takeaway:  The ACA International ruling is an important decision for telemarketers, lead generators, call centers and TCPA defendants.  It clarified the definition of ATDS and made it  a bit more challenging for TCPA plaintiffs to recover damages.  As always, those engaged in telemarketing campaigns should consult with experienced FTC CID attorneys and, without limitation, conduct thorough compliance audits, ensure that recipients of calls have provided lawful prior express consent to be called, and establish proper opt-out and revocation of consent protocols. 

Richard B. Newman is an FTC attorney at Hinch Newman LLP.  Follow FTC CID lawyers on LinkedIn.

Attorney Advertising. Informational purposes only. Not legal advice.

Related posts:

  1. Telephone Consumer Protection Act Update – TCPA FCC Commissioner Delivers Pro-Telemarketer TCPA Speech – May 2019 FCC...
  2. New York Becoming Leader of Financial Consumer Protection The state of New York has long been considered a...
  3. TCPA Alert December 2018 FCC Releases Draft Order to Combat “Robocalls” The Federal Communications...
  4. Individualized Issues of Consent Result in TCPA Class Action Certification Denial Class actions are designed to promote the efficiency of litigation...

Filed Under: Blue Book, Bluebook Magazine, Default, Revenue, Revenue Blog Tagged With: FCC Compliance, FTC Compliance, TCPA, Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Search

ROS Col 2 Top

ROS Col 2 Mid

ROS Col 2 Low

Subscribe to our newsletter!

* indicates required

ROS Col 2 – 4 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 5 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 6 Misc

Recent Posts

  • Top 4 Best Practices For Consumer Finance Campaigns
  • Four Moments That Changed Performance Marketing Forever
  • New additions, improvements, and added perks from your favorite CPA network
  • Your Top 5 Affiliate Marketing Questions Answered
  • 5 strategies to create better content
  • FCC Says Ringless Voicemails Require Prior Consent
  • Top 5 Free Methods to Increase Affiliate Traffic
  •  3 Top Lead Generation Best Practices To Scale Your Business
  • Automation, Conversions, Profitability, Oh My – Breaking Affiliate Campaign Roadblocks
  • 5 tips for a better brand image
  • How Mac of All Trades Found Multi-Channel Success
  • Winning In A Changing World: An Interview with Taras Kiseliuk, CEO of ClickDealer
  • Survey: What Consumers Want from Financial Services Providers
  • The influencer marketing era: what does the future of web marketing hold?
  • Top 5 Ways To Leverage CPA Campaigns During The Holiday Shopping Season

About mThink

mThink is a specialist digital marketing company based in San Francisco. We focus on media buying, Facebook marketing, direct response, social and mobile. In addition mThink produces the annual Blue Book Rankings of major performance marketing networks. Read More »

Baseboard

Copyright ©2023 · mThink. All rights reserved.
3053 Fillmore Street, Suite 325 | (415) 787-0250
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy