• Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • mThink Digital
  • Thought Leadership
    • White Papers
  • About
    • Content Marketing
    • Content Strategy
      • Web Content
      • Social Media Strategy
      • Webinars & Video
      • Thought Leadership
    • Performance Marketing
    • Portfolio
      • Revenue Performance
      • Accenture
      • Microsoft
      • Java Detour
      • Our Process
    • Contact Us

mThink

Blue Book Logo

BlueBook Logo

The Trusted Name in Performance Marketing

ROS Leaderboard

  • Home
  • Blue Book
    • About Blue Book
    • Blue Ribbon Panel
    • Interviews
    • Research Methodology
    • Back Issues
    • Advertising
      • Website Creative Specifications
      • Newsletter Creative Specifications
  • Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • Best European CPA Networks
  • Best CPA Networks for Affiliates
  • Best CPA Networks for Advertisers

Court Enforces TCPA Clickwrap Agreement in a Victory for Marketers

June 10, 2020 by Richard B. Newman

One of the key issues in any Telephone Consumer Protection Act class action lawsuit is whether there exists “prior express written consent.”  In a noteworthy victory for marketers, consent related mechanisms made all the difference.

In Lundbom v. Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., the plaintiff filed a TCPA lawsuit, alleging that the defendant violated the TCPA by sending her numerous promotional text messages.  The defendant moved to dismiss and argued that the plaintiff provided prior express written consent to receive the messages at the time she created an account on the defendant’s website.

On the account registration page, the plaintiff was presented with the option of agreeing to receive communications.  This disclosure read: “Stay connected – Receive delivery notifications, important updates and program news sent straight to your phone.”

Immediately below this disclosure was a pre-checked “text message disclosure” box, which stated:  “You agree and consent via your electronic signature by clicking the check box to receive calls at the provided number which will deliver automated, live and/or prerecorded messages, text messages, and text alerts by or on behalf of Schwan’s Home Service. This agreement is not entered into as a term or requirement of purchase. You will receive recurring messages. Msg & Data Rates May Apply. Mobile Terms: schwans.com/tc. Schwan’s Privacy Policy: schwans.com/privacy. Reply HELP for help. Reply STOP to cancel.”

The plaintiff argued that no prior express written consent existed because the first disclosure  provided no express notice that she would receive promotional marketing communications, the second disclosure did not amount to express consent because the box was pre-checked.

The court disagreed.  It evaluated the disclosures from the standpoint of a reasonable consumer and held that words such as “advertisement” or “telemarketing” need not be present to effectively notify a consumer that marketing messages would be forthcoming.  In this context, according to the court, a reasonable consumer would have understood that the disclosures were providing such notice, including reference to “important updates” and “program news.” from a company whose sole purpose is to sell products.

The court also held that the pre-checked box was not fatal for the defendant, in part, because it was located directly next to the disclosure and that the plaintiff needed to scroll past it to complete her registration.  The court also considered that the plaintiff assented to terms and conditions that were hyperlinked in the disclosure, and which contained clear and conspicuous language regarding the receipt of promotional text messages.

Takeaway:  While interesting, the outcome here should not be relied upon as precedent that pre-checked boxes are an effective means to obtain and enforce affirmative assent.  Nor should it be relied upon as standing for the idea that express reference to promotional marketing messages is not required.  Prior express written consent should be clear, conspicuous and prominent, contain all the necessary legal components and plainly set forth the intended use of consumers’ personal information. 

Richard B. Newman is an FTC attorney at Hinch Newman LLP.  Follow him on National Law Review @ FTC Defense Lawyer and on Twitter @ FTC Defense Lawyer.

Informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May be considered attorney advertising.

 

Related posts:

  1. CBD Advertising and FTC Enforcement Since passage of the “Farm Bill” which legalized hemp-derived CBD...
  2. Court Addresses Unconstitutional TCPA Damages and Who Can be Held Liable A company that managed the ownership rights of a film...
  3. Federal Court Holds TCPA Plaintiff Did Not Adequately Allege ATDS In Bader v. Navient Solutions, LLC (N.D. Ill. June 14,...
  4. Telephone Consumer Protection Act Update – TCPA FCC Commissioner Delivers Pro-Telemarketer TCPA Speech – May 2019 FCC...

Filed Under: Blue Book, Revenue, Revenue Blog Tagged With: Ftc attorney, TCPA, Telephone Consumer Protection Act

Search

ROS Col 2 Top

ROS Col 2 Mid

ROS Col 2 Low

Subscribe to our newsletter!

* indicates required

ROS Col 2 – 4 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 5 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 6 Misc

Recent Posts

  • 2023: Challenges, Opportunities & Predictions
  • Top 4 Best Practices For Consumer Finance Campaigns
  • Four Moments That Changed Performance Marketing Forever
  • New additions, improvements, and added perks from your favorite CPA network
  • Your Top 5 Affiliate Marketing Questions Answered
  • 5 strategies to create better content
  • FCC Says Ringless Voicemails Require Prior Consent
  • Top 5 Free Methods to Increase Affiliate Traffic
  •  3 Top Lead Generation Best Practices To Scale Your Business
  • Automation, Conversions, Profitability, Oh My – Breaking Affiliate Campaign Roadblocks
  • 5 tips for a better brand image
  • How Mac of All Trades Found Multi-Channel Success
  • Winning In A Changing World: An Interview with Taras Kiseliuk, CEO of ClickDealer
  • Survey: What Consumers Want from Financial Services Providers
  • The influencer marketing era: what does the future of web marketing hold?

About mThink

mThink is a specialist digital marketing company based in San Francisco. We focus on media buying, Facebook marketing, direct response, social and mobile. In addition mThink produces the annual Blue Book Rankings of major performance marketing networks. Read More »

Baseboard

Copyright ©2023 · mThink. All rights reserved.
3053 Fillmore Street, Suite 325 | (415) 787-0250
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy