• Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • mThink Digital
  • Thought Leadership
    • White Papers
  • About
    • Content Marketing
    • Content Strategy
      • Web Content
      • Social Media Strategy
      • Webinars & Video
      • Thought Leadership
    • Performance Marketing
    • Portfolio
      • Revenue Performance
      • Accenture
      • Microsoft
      • Java Detour
      • Our Process
    • Contact Us

mThink

Blue Book Logo

BlueBook Logo

The Trusted Name in Performance Marketing

Revenue & eCommerce Blog

  • Home
  • Blue Book
    • About Blue Book
    • Blue Ribbon Panel
    • Interviews
    • Research Methodology
    • Back Issues
    • Advertising
      • Website Creative Specifications
      • Newsletter Creative Specifications
  • Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • Best European CPA Networks
  • Best CPA Networks for Affiliates
  • Best CPA Networks for Advertisers

Supreme Court Expands TCPA to Cover More Categories of Speech

July 13, 2020 by Richard B. Newman

In a 6-3 opinion, delivered by Justice Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court affirmed the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. and held that the government-debt carve-out from the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s robocall restrictions can be severed from the rest of the TCPA, leaving the automated calling provisions intact.

The decision begins by stating that “Americans passionately disagree about many things.  But they are largely united in their disdain for robocalls.”  Thus, the Court was not willing to declare the entire automated calling provision unconstitutional when “tens of millions of consumers would be bombarded every day with nonstop robocalls.”

The Supreme Court considered whether a compelling governmental interest exists to justify the government-debt exception that permitted robocalls made solely to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States, and whether the TCPA is narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.

The Court also considered various content-related legal issues between a lawful robocall that says “pay your government debt” and an unlawful one that says “donate to our political campaign.”

The ruling also rejected plaintiffs’ argument that the entire statute is unconstitutional because Congress has demonstrated its continued interest by retaining a “very broad restriction on robocalls” that “proscribes tens of millions of would-be robocalls that would otherwise occur every day.”

From a practical perspective and although the robocall restriction does not apply to the federal government itself, the Court’s finding that the government-debt exception failed to pass judicial constitutional scrutiny results in the breadth of the TCPA now being expanded to cover more types of speech.  It is reasonable to anticipate that TCPA plaintiffs’ lawyers may become even more active.  TCPA compliance, including automated calls to mobile phones, is more important now that ever.

This matter should be of interest to telemarketers, including lead generators that generate and/or facilitate the purchase/sale of telemarketing leads.  Consult with an experienced FTC defense attorney to discuss the implementation of preventative compliance protocols.

Richard B. Newman is an FTC attorney at Hinch Newman LLP.  Follow him on Twitter   @FTC defense lawyer.

Informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May be considered attorney advertising.

 

Related posts:

  1. California’s New Data Broker Registration Law If compliance with the California Consumer Privacy Act isn’t enough...
  2. Telephone Consumer Protection Act Update – TCPA FCC Commissioner Delivers Pro-Telemarketer TCPA Speech – May 2019 FCC...
  3. SCOTUS to Hear Internet Sales Tax Case The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal...
  4. FDA Issues CBD Substantiation Warnings On November 1, 2017, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)...

Filed Under: Blue Book, Revenue, Revenue Blog Tagged With: FTC defense attorney, FTC defense lawyer, TCPA

Search

ROS Column 2 High – 300×250 (Global)

ROS Column 2 Mid – 300×250 (Global)

ROS Column 2 Low – 300×misc (Global)

Subscribe to our newsletter!

* indicates required

Lowest Ad in Column 2 – 300×250

Recent Posts

  • Court Holds Professional TCPA Litigant Can Face Fraud-Based Counterclaim
  • Defendant Behind Alleged Bogus Health Insurance Scheme Agrees to Settle FTC Charges
  • How to Set Up a Warm Transfer Campaign Without Breaking the Bank (Step by Step)
  • Five Advertisers Speak Their Minds on the Importance of Network Partnerships, Transparency, and Fraud Prevention
  • Why All Media Buyers Need to Add Pay Per Call in 2021
  • Court Holds No TCPA Standing With Ringless Voice Mail Message
  • Promote E-gift Cards to Drive More Last-Minute Holiday Sales
  • Ecommerce Is On Top Of The World As Consumers Embrace Online Shopping Like Never Before
  • DoJ Announces Historic Civil Penalty in a Telemarketing Enforcement Action
  • How ClickDealer Grew To Be The Best CPA Network In Europe – An Interview with Taras Kiseliuk
  • Why Fewer, Better Customers Is The Way To Thrive – An Interview With Olivier Bourque, CrakRevenue
  • The Best CPA Networks In Europe
  • Alexandra Forsch of Awin & ShareASale Talks Opportunities, Technology & How Affiliate Marketing Will Take A Bigger Share Of Ad Budgets
  • How Networks Drive Efficiencies For Advertisers & Publishers – An Interview With Some of The Perform[cb] Leadership Team
  • Can an EBR be Created DURING a Telephone Solicitation?

About mThink

mThink is a specialist digital marketing company based in San Francisco. We focus on media buying, Facebook marketing, direct response, social and mobile. In addition mThink produces the annual Blue Book Rankings of major performance marketing networks. Read More »

Copyright ©2021 · mThink. All rights reserved.
3053 Fillmore Street, Suite 325 | (415) 787-0250
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy