• Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • mThink Digital
  • Thought Leadership
    • White Papers
  • About
    • Content Marketing
    • Content Strategy
      • Web Content
      • Social Media Strategy
      • Webinars & Video
      • Thought Leadership
    • Performance Marketing
    • Portfolio
      • Revenue Performance
      • Accenture
      • Microsoft
      • Java Detour
      • Our Process
    • Contact Us

mThink

Blue Book Logo

BlueBook Logo

The Trusted Name in Performance Marketing

ROS Leaderboard

  • Home
  • Blue Book
    • About Blue Book
    • Blue Ribbon Panel
    • Interviews
    • Research Methodology
    • Back Issues
    • Advertising
      • Website Creative Specifications
      • Newsletter Creative Specifications
  • Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • Best European CPA Networks
  • Best CPA Networks for Affiliates
  • Best CPA Networks for Advertisers

Supreme Court Expands TCPA to Cover More Categories of Speech

July 13, 2020 by Richard B. Newman

In a 6-3 opinion, delivered by Justice Kavanaugh, the Supreme Court affirmed the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants, Inc. and held that the government-debt carve-out from the Telephone Consumer Protection Act’s robocall restrictions can be severed from the rest of the TCPA, leaving the automated calling provisions intact.

The decision begins by stating that “Americans passionately disagree about many things.  But they are largely united in their disdain for robocalls.”  Thus, the Court was not willing to declare the entire automated calling provision unconstitutional when “tens of millions of consumers would be bombarded every day with nonstop robocalls.”

The Supreme Court considered whether a compelling governmental interest exists to justify the government-debt exception that permitted robocalls made solely to collect a debt owed to or guaranteed by the United States, and whether the TCPA is narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.

The Court also considered various content-related legal issues between a lawful robocall that says “pay your government debt” and an unlawful one that says “donate to our political campaign.”

The ruling also rejected plaintiffs’ argument that the entire statute is unconstitutional because Congress has demonstrated its continued interest by retaining a “very broad restriction on robocalls” that “proscribes tens of millions of would-be robocalls that would otherwise occur every day.”

From a practical perspective and although the robocall restriction does not apply to the federal government itself, the Court’s finding that the government-debt exception failed to pass judicial constitutional scrutiny results in the breadth of the TCPA now being expanded to cover more types of speech.  It is reasonable to anticipate that TCPA plaintiffs’ lawyers may become even more active.  TCPA compliance, including automated calls to mobile phones, is more important now that ever.

This matter should be of interest to telemarketers, including lead generators that generate and/or facilitate the purchase/sale of telemarketing leads.  Consult with an experienced FTC defense attorney to discuss the implementation of preventative compliance protocols.

Richard B. Newman is an FTC attorney at Hinch Newman LLP.  Follow him on Twitter   @FTC defense lawyer.

Informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May be considered attorney advertising.

 

Related posts:

  1. California Redefines Analysis of Independent Contractor Classification In September 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a new...
  2. Federal Court Holds TCPA Plaintiff Did Not Adequately Allege ATDS In Bader v. Navient Solutions, LLC (N.D. Ill. June 14,...
  3. The Story Behind $O FTC Settlements and Suspended Judgments It is a phrase you see or hear attorneys make...
  4. SCOTUS to Hear Internet Sales Tax Case The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal...

Filed Under: Blue Book, Revenue, Revenue Blog Tagged With: FTC defense attorney, FTC defense lawyer, TCPA

Search

ROS Col 2 Top

ROS Col 2 Mid

ROS Col 2 Low

Subscribe to our newsletter!

* indicates required

ROS Col 2 – 4 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 5 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 6 Misc

Recent Posts

  • Navigating The Debt Relief Landscape: Targeted Advertising Tactics For Success
  • Top 5 Tips For Managing AEP/OEP Season And Adapting To Changing CMS Regulations
  • Enrollment Marketing Reinvented: 6 Best Practices To Engage & Enroll High-Intent Prospective Students
  • Trying To Drive Up Open Rates? Try These 8 Email Subject Line Strategies
  • Richard B. Newman Selected to Author Consumer Protection Section of ALM FTC Law Treatise
  • The Aragon Company CEO on AI, Influencers, Connected TV, & Dynamic Pricing in Performance Marketing
  • It’s Time To Scale Your Home Services Lead Generation Campaigns
  • How MyLead works, and what sets it apart from other affiliate networks?
  • You Can Build Successful Lead Partnerships! Here Are 5 Questions To Get You Started
  • How To Build Long-Term Partnerships For Success
  • Interview with Rakuten Advertising’s Managing Director of North America, Anthony Capano
  • How To Source, Vet & Grow Quality Publisher Partnerships For Pay-Per-Call
  • FTC Settlement With Credit Karma Underscores Agency Attention to A/B Testing
  • Rakuten Advertising named mThink’s Best Affiliate Network for 12 Consecutive Years
  • 2023: Challenges, Opportunities & Predictions

About mThink

mThink is a specialist digital marketing company based in San Francisco. We focus on media buying, Facebook marketing, direct response, social and mobile. In addition mThink produces the annual Blue Book Rankings of major performance marketing networks. Read More »

Baseboard

Copyright ©2023 · mThink. All rights reserved.
3053 Fillmore Street, Suite 325 | (415) 787-0250
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy