• Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • mThink Digital
  • Thought Leadership
    • White Papers
  • About
    • Content Marketing
    • Content Strategy
      • Web Content
      • Social Media Strategy
      • Webinars & Video
      • Thought Leadership
    • Performance Marketing
    • Portfolio
      • Revenue Performance
      • Accenture
      • Microsoft
      • Java Detour
      • Our Process
    • Contact Us

mThink

Blue Book Logo

BlueBook Logo

The Trusted Name in Performance Marketing

ROS Leaderboard

  • Home
  • Blue Book
    • About Blue Book
    • Blue Ribbon Panel
    • Interviews
    • Research Methodology
    • Back Issues
    • Advertising
      • Website Creative Specifications
      • Newsletter Creative Specifications
  • Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • Best European CPA Networks
  • Best CPA Networks for Affiliates
  • Best CPA Networks for Advertisers

FTC Investigation and Enforcement Trends

April 8, 2018 by Richard B. Newman

Privacy and data security-related issues remain a hot-button subject and the parameters are still being defined by the FTC, as well as courts.

Recently, the FTC has challenged alleged inadequate data security measures on the basis that they constitute “unfair business practices.”  The FTC Act defines unfair business practices as practices that cause or are likely to cause “substantial injury” to consumers which is not reasonably avoidable by consumers themselves and not outweighed by countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition.

The FTC v. D-Link Corporation matter (N. District of California) is noteworthy.  Here, the FTC alleged that the defendant misrepresented the level of data security associated with its devices and that it failed to take reasonable steps to protect consumers’ personal information from hackers.

D-Link sought dismissal of the Commission’s “unfairness” claim on the basis that there was no concrete consumer harm.  The court agreed, holding that the FTC failed to identify an incident in which a consumer’s sensitive personal information had been accessed or misused, stating, “[i]f the FTC had tied the unfairness claim to the representations underlying the deception claims, it might have had a more colorable injury element.  A consumer’s purchase of a device that fails to be reasonably secure – let alone as secure as advertised – would likely be in the ballpark of a ‘substantial injury,’ particularly when aggregated across a large group of consumers.  But the FTC pursued a different and ultimately untenable track.”

Companies with data security practices that do not live up to the promises they make to consumers via marketing materials or privacy policies, are at risk.

For example, early this year a children’s technology company – VTech Electronics – settled FTC charges that it failed to abide by the terms of its privacy policy and violated the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act for failure to acquire verifiable parental consent regarding its data collection practices.  Regarding the former, according to the FTC, the company’s  privacy policy misrepresented that it encrypted all transmitted registration data that contained personal identification information.

The FTC also continues to focus upon recurring payment issues.  ROSCA compliance is a regulatory favorite.  Simply stated, material terms must be clearly and conspicuously disclosed.  Express informed consent is required, as is a simple cancellation mechanism.

Most recently, the Commission – and various state AGs – have had a particular interest in business coaching enterprises.  All those involved in such activities, including lead generators, should bolster operational compliance protocols.  Express and implied representations should be assessed (e.g., earnings claims). Telemarketing components, earnings disclosures, the value of educational materials, the experience of coaches, the compensation structure of sales personnel, the authenticity of reviews, contractual ad content liability shifting-related provision and due diligence assessments are relevant.

The FTC has been aggressively expanding the zone of liability for deceptive advertising practices to third-parties.  Targets can include, without limitation, affiliate marketers, lead generators, networks, payment processors and product owners.

In addition to the foregoing, there are no signs that the FTC will be pumping the brakes any time soon with respect to the enforcement of:

  • Social media endorsement disclosure guidelines
  • Native advertising disclosure requirements
  • Health claim-related substantiation obligations

Consult with an advertising, marketing and promotions lawyer for further information regarding recent FTC investigation and enforcement trends, or if you are the subject of a regulatory action.

Richard B. Newman is an Internet marketing compliance and regulatory defense attorney at Hinch Newman LLP focusing on advertising and digital media matters. His practice includes conducting legal compliance reviews of advertising campaigns, representing clients in investigations and enforcement actions brought by the Federal Trade Commission and state Attorneys General, commercial litigation, advising clients on promotional marketing programs, and negotiating and drafting legal agreements. You can find him on LinkedIn at FTC Attorney.

ADVERTISING MATERIAL. These materials are provided for informational purposes only and are not to be considered legal advice, nor do they create a lawyer-client relationship. No person should act or rely on any information in this article without seeking the advice of an attorney. Information on previous case results does not guarantee a similar future result. Hinch Newman LLP | 40 Wall St., 35thFloor, New York, NY 10005 | (212) 756-8777

Related posts:

  1. The Story Behind $O FTC Settlements and Suspended Judgments It is a phrase you see or hear attorneys make...
  2. FTC and FCC Announce MOU to Coordinate Online Consumer Protection Efforts On December 11 2017, the Federal Trade Commission and Federal...
  3. FDA Issues CBD Substantiation Warnings On November 1, 2017, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)...
  4. FTC Defense Lawyer Alert: Nationwide Crackdown on Student Loan Debt Relief Document Preparation Services Continues Earlier this month, the Federal Trade Commission, along with 11...

Filed Under: Blue Book, Revenue Tagged With: data security, Ftc attorney, Ftc compliance lawyer, FTC defense lawyer, privacy

Search

ROS Col 2 Top

ROS Col 2 Mid

ROS Col 2 Low

Subscribe to our newsletter!

* indicates required

ROS Col 2 – 4 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 5 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 6 Misc

Recent Posts

  • FTC Reminds Lead Generators Not to Misuse Sensitive Consumer Data
  • Use of Certain Technologies to Track Web Session Data May Violate Law
  • How Financial Marketers Can Boost New Customer Growth on an Affiliate Model
  • Crypto Griftonomics And Influencers In Affiliate Marketing
  • Don’t forget about click-to-call: the most underrated vertical for social media traffic
  • Why The Speed of Relevance Can Help You Win
  • Why Should Marketers Invest In Pay Per Call?
  • CFPB Issues Warning About Contractual Gag Clauses and Consumer Reviews
  • New Blue Book Top 20 CPS Affiliate Network Results
  • FTC Rules With Civil Monetary Penalties for Deceptive Earnings Claims and Targeted Marketing May Be Forthcoming
  • New Blue Book Results: Top 20 CPA Affiliate Networks For 2022
  • FTC Rules With Civil Monetary Penalties for Deceptive Earnings Claims and Targeted Marketing May Be Forthcoming
  • Top 4 Ways To Make Your Call Campaigns More Successful
  • Perform[cb]’s New Mobile App For Partners Is A Game Changer
  • Shaping the Perfect Matchmaker for Content Creators

About mThink

mThink is a specialist digital marketing company based in San Francisco. We focus on media buying, Facebook marketing, direct response, social and mobile. In addition mThink produces the annual Blue Book Rankings of major performance marketing networks. Read More »

Baseboard

Copyright ©2022 · mThink. All rights reserved.
3053 Fillmore Street, Suite 325 | (415) 787-0250
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy