• Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • mThink Digital
  • Thought Leadership
    • White Papers
  • About
    • Content Marketing
    • Content Strategy
      • Web Content
      • Social Media Strategy
      • Webinars & Video
      • Thought Leadership
    • Performance Marketing
    • Portfolio
      • Revenue Performance
      • Accenture
      • Microsoft
      • Java Detour
      • Our Process
    • Contact Us

mThink

Blue Book Logo

BlueBook Logo

The Trusted Name in Performance Marketing

ROS Leaderboard

  • Home
  • Blue Book
    • About Blue Book
    • Blue Ribbon Panel
    • Interviews
    • Research Methodology
    • Back Issues
    • Advertising
      • Website Creative Specifications
      • Newsletter Creative Specifications
  • Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • Best European CPA Networks
  • Best CPA Networks for Affiliates
  • Best CPA Networks for Advertisers

Copyright Attorney Discusses Advertiser Vicarious Liability for Social Media Influencer Infringement

September 21, 2022 by Richard B. Newman

UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2022 WL 2670339 (S.D. Fla. July 11, 2022) involves a copyright infringement action brought by a group of music publishers and record companies against an energy drink and sports nutrition supplement company doing business as Bang Energy and its CEO.  

The plaintiffs’ claims included direct and indirect infringement resulting from TikTok videos that allegedly featured plaintiffs’ copyrighted works.  According to plaintiffs, the videos were posted both by Bang, itself, and social media influencers hired by Bang to promote its products.  

Bang also obtained ownership of the videos the influencers created.  In order to get paid, the influencers submitted the videos to Bang for auditing prior to being posted.  The videos were verified by Bang, including criteria that influencers “tag” Bang in the TikTok posts.  Importantly, Bang’s criteria did not include a prohibition regarding the use of copyrighted music.  

In addition, more than 100 videos were posted by Bang and its CEO on their own TikTok accounts.  A handful of videos were posted by influencers to the influencers’ TikTok accounts.

The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants were liable for direct infringement with respect to the videos posted to the defendants’ accounts and were liable for contributory and/or vicarious infringement with respect to the videos posted to the influencers’ accounts.

As for the direct infringement claims, the court recently held that plaintiffs were entitled to partial summary judgment as to the issue of liability because plaintiffs owned/controlled valid copyrights and defendants posted the videos utilizing portions of plaintiffs’ original copyrighted work.

The court also held that plaintiffs were not entitled to summary judgment as to the issue of liability on their claims against Bang for contributory infringement.  Contributory copyright infringement requires a showing of intentionally inducing or encouraging direct infringement.  The court found that the plaintiffs failed to address evidence that the defendants were not actually involved in the creation of the videos or music in question.

As to the issue of vicarious infringement, the court ruled that plaintiffs were entitled to summary judgment as to the issue of liability on their claims against Bang.  In order to be vicariously liable for the actions of a third party, a defendant must exercise control over the direct infringer (i.e., the influencers) and obtain a financial benefit from the infringement. 

Here, on the control element, the court found that Bang’s audit right resulted in knowledge of the influencers’ copyright infringement and that Bang nonetheless paid the influencers, therefore.  Consequently, Bang failed to stop or limit the infringement despite the ability to do so.  But the court ruled that the plaintiffs did not establish a financial benefit to the defendants from the infringement, in part, due to a lack of supporting evidence and the attempted introduction by the plaintiffs of untimely evidence.

While the defendants succeeded in their indirect infringement arguments at the summary judgment stage, it will presumably be much simpler for the plaintiffs to establish their claims at trial.

Takeaway:  Advertisers can face significant monetary liability exposure for infringing social media content used by influencers that are contracted for marketing campaigns. Companies that use influencer marketing should consider consulting with an eCommerce attorney in order to ensure that contractual rights and oversight ability are implemented properly so as to mitigate liability exposure.  

Richard B. Newman is a copyright lawyer that represents the interests of digital marketers at Hinch Newman LLP. Follow Richard on JD Supra at FTC defense lawyer.

Informational purposes only. Not legal advice. May be considered attorney advertising.

Related posts:

  1. Consumer Shopping Trends to Look For in the 2022 Holiday Season As the holiday season approaches and retailers prepare to attract...
  2. Ten Tips on How to BE A CONTENT CREATOR in Affiliate Marketing Content creators are taking the lead. After 20 years of...
  3. How Deceptive User Interface Design Increases E-Commerce Sales  A fascinating Princeton study found hundreds of examples of deceptive...
  4. New York Becoming Leader of Financial Consumer Protection The state of New York has long been considered a...

Filed Under: Article, Blue Book, Default, Revenue Blog

Search

ROS Col 2 Top

ROS Col 2 Mid

ROS Col 2 Low

Subscribe to our newsletter!

* indicates required

ROS Col 2 – 4 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 5 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 6 Misc

Recent Posts

  • How MyLead works, and what sets it apart from other affiliate networks?
  • You Can Build Successful Lead Partnerships! Here Are 5 Questions To Get You Started
  • How To Build Long-Term Partnerships For Success
  • Interview with Rakuten Advertising’s Managing Director of North America, Anthony Capano
  • How To Source, Vet & Grow Quality Publisher Partnerships For Pay-Per-Call
  • FTC Settlement With Credit Karma Underscores Agency Attention to A/B Testing
  • Rakuten Advertising named mThink’s Best Affiliate Network for 12 Consecutive Years
  • 2023: Challenges, Opportunities & Predictions
  • Top 4 Best Practices For Consumer Finance Campaigns
  • Four Moments That Changed Performance Marketing Forever
  • New additions, improvements, and added perks from your favorite CPA network
  • Your Top 5 Affiliate Marketing Questions Answered
  • 5 strategies to create better content
  • FCC Says Ringless Voicemails Require Prior Consent
  • Top 5 Free Methods to Increase Affiliate Traffic

About mThink

mThink is a specialist digital marketing company based in San Francisco. We focus on media buying, Facebook marketing, direct response, social and mobile. In addition mThink produces the annual Blue Book Rankings of major performance marketing networks. Read More »

Baseboard

Copyright ©2023 · mThink. All rights reserved.
3053 Fillmore Street, Suite 325 | (415) 787-0250
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy