• Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • mThink Digital
  • Thought Leadership
    • White Papers
  • About
    • Content Marketing
    • Content Strategy
      • Web Content
      • Social Media Strategy
      • Webinars & Video
      • Thought Leadership
    • Performance Marketing
    • Portfolio
      • Revenue Performance
      • Accenture
      • Microsoft
      • Java Detour
      • Our Process
    • Contact Us

mThink

Blue Book Logo

BlueBook Logo

The Trusted Name in Performance Marketing

ROS Leaderboard

  • Home
  • Blue Book
    • About Blue Book
    • Blue Ribbon Panel
    • Interviews
    • Research Methodology
    • Back Issues
    • Advertising
      • Website Creative Specifications
      • Newsletter Creative Specifications
  • Best CPA Networks
  • Best Cost-Per-Sale Affiliate Networks
  • Best Pay-Per-Call Networks
  • Best European CPA Networks
  • Best CPA Networks for Affiliates
  • Best CPA Networks for Advertisers

California Court Says Customer Lists Not a Trade Secret

November 8, 2018 by Richard B. Newman

The California Court of Appeal recently held that a non-solicitation of employee provision improperly impinged on the ability to freely engage in gainful employment. Historically, California courts have upheld such agreements in limited situations if they are reasonable.

The case involves individual defendants that executed a Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreement.  The Agreement specifically prohibited the solicitation of plaintiff’s employees for one year.  In addition to finding that the non-solicitation provision was unlawful, the court also found that customer names and identities were not trade secrets.  The court of appeal affirmed the ruling.

The court found that the identity and contact information were not “secrets” because they were already known to the defendant, and were readily ascertainable via social media and by word of mouth.  The court also considered that such information was not acquired via a proprietary database.

The court also held that a list of names and email addresses that was forwarded by an individual defendant to a personal email account prior to terminating employment with defendant was not a protectable trade secret because it did not cause plaintiff any damage.

The case is AMN Healthcare, Inc. v. Aya Healthcare Services, Inc.  Defendant alleges that AMN pursued litigation in bad faith and that used anti-competitive behaviors that are now the subject of a separate antitrust lawsuit.

Consult with an experienced legal professional about policy and applicable legal precedent regarding restrictive covenants.  Historically, non-solicit and non-compete agreements are viewed skeptically by courts, particularly in California.

With regard to the latter, a new Massachusetts law has been passed that limits non-competes.  Utah and Idaho have also recently passed laws regulating employee non-compete agreements.  The Massachusetts law applies to employees and independent contractors.  It requires, inter alia, that such agreements be reasonable in scope and duration, be in writing and signed by both parties.  Notice to the employee/contractor is also required, as is the obligation to advise the employee/contractor that they have the right to consult independent legal counsel.

Employers must also must provide statutorily required notice and non-competes effective during (versus, prior to) employment must be supported by separate consideration.  They Massachusetts law is unusual in that employers are required to pay the employee/contractor a set amount during the entire non-compete period, unless the employee/contractor breaches the agreement.  Non-competes are prohibit under the new law for employees/contractors that are terminated without cause.

Richard B. Newman is an FTC investigation lawyer at Hinch Newman LLP.  Follow him on Facebook and LinkedIn.

Informational purposes only. Not legal advice. Always seek the advice of an attorney. Previous case results do not guarantee similar future result. Hinch Newman LLP | 40 Wall St., 35th Floor, New York, NY 10005 | (212) 756-8777

ADVERTISING MATERIAL

 

 

 

Related posts:

  1. FTC Testifies Before Congress About Combatting Payment Processors That Facilitate Fraud On July 26, 2018, the Federal Trade Commission testified before...
  2. FTC Reiterates Privacy and Data Security Priorities The Federal Trade Commission recently testified before the House Energy...
  3. California Enacts GDPR-Like Privacy Changes On the heels of Colorado’s new cybersecurity legislation, California has...
  4. Senators Propose Internet Privacy Bill That Threatens Digital Advertising Earlier this month, Senators Richard Blumenthal and Ed Markey (D-MA)...

Filed Under: Blue Book, Revenue Tagged With: California Court, FTC Compliance

Search

ROS Col 2 Top

ROS Col 2 Mid

ROS Col 2 Low

Subscribe to our newsletter!

* indicates required

ROS Col 2 – 4 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 5 Misc

ROS Col 2 – 6 Misc

Recent Posts

  • How MyLead works, and what sets it apart from other affiliate networks?
  • You Can Build Successful Lead Partnerships! Here Are 5 Questions To Get You Started
  • How To Build Long-Term Partnerships For Success
  • Interview with Rakuten Advertising’s Managing Director of North America, Anthony Capano
  • How To Source, Vet & Grow Quality Publisher Partnerships For Pay-Per-Call
  • FTC Settlement With Credit Karma Underscores Agency Attention to A/B Testing
  • Rakuten Advertising named mThink’s Best Affiliate Network for 12 Consecutive Years
  • 2023: Challenges, Opportunities & Predictions
  • Top 4 Best Practices For Consumer Finance Campaigns
  • Four Moments That Changed Performance Marketing Forever
  • New additions, improvements, and added perks from your favorite CPA network
  • Your Top 5 Affiliate Marketing Questions Answered
  • 5 strategies to create better content
  • FCC Says Ringless Voicemails Require Prior Consent
  • Top 5 Free Methods to Increase Affiliate Traffic

About mThink

mThink is a specialist digital marketing company based in San Francisco. We focus on media buying, Facebook marketing, direct response, social and mobile. In addition mThink produces the annual Blue Book Rankings of major performance marketing networks. Read More »

Baseboard

Copyright ©2023 · mThink. All rights reserved.
3053 Fillmore Street, Suite 325 | (415) 787-0250
Disclaimer | Privacy Policy