Utility Service Delivery Management by Chris Trayhorn, Publisher of mThink Blue Book, March 11, 2004 The conversations between senior officers and managers at utilities are similar worldwide. They need to reduce operations and maintenance expenses, increase the reliability and performance of the infrastructure, improve customer service, and make better use of limited capital. At a minimum they talk about tightening the belt. Some even talk about a desire for “transformation” or achieving “operational excellence.” Easy words to say, but how are such concepts realized? The biggest single opportunity for simultaneous improvement on all of these fronts is through service delivery management (SDM), a holistic approach to service for optimizing your customers, assets, and workforce. It is important to understand that this concept includes all aspects of service – customer service, field service, design service, construction service, and maintenance service. Simply stated, optimization alludes to creating a state in which the best conditions exist and the best results are achieved at the cost everyone is willing to pay. So the key is to find a way to deliver more for the money. Increased productivity and lowered costs must be achieved through increasing asset performance, streamlining the supply chain, ensuring customer satisfaction and loyalty, increasing workforce efficiency, and maximizing overall financial performance. A plan must be developed to determine how to change underlying practices to produce improved results in each area. Key processes should be instrumented to identify and provide full visibility of key performance indicators and to trigger events such as alerts when certain predetermined conditions are reached. Consider the effects on the organization and the bottom line if you could: Reduce operations and maintenance labor costs by 25 to 35 percent; Improve system reliability and reduce the frequency of unplanned outages by 15 to 50 percent; Reduce inventory levels by 15 to 30 percent; and Improve customer satisfaction and loyalty. With few exceptions, SDM offers significant opportunity to achieve results similar to those above. Conventional approaches, focused only on discrete areas and systems, have allowed realization of some marginal improvements, but not at levels to actually transform the business and facilitate operational excellence. What’s Required? The SDM approach requires consideration of the broader context of managing all of the business processes related to customers, assets, and workforce. Its foundation is built on three disciplines: customer relationship management, enterprise asset management, and workforce management. Unlike any one of these disciplines, which tend to be customer-centric, asset-centric, or workforce-centric, SDM is process-centric. Thus, it focuses on the business flows within and across each discipline and optimizes these processes to achieve new levels of performance. It is no longer enough to be just customer-centric, just asset-centric, or just workforce-centric. You have to be process-centric. Beyond these three disciplines in a process-centric environment, each component of SDM should be capable of managing the entire scope of its primary entity focus with additional critical capabilities described in Figure 1. Customer Relationship Management The customer relationship management (CRM) component must manage all of the customer interactions including all types of customers (commercial, residential, etc.), all charges for all services regardless of origination or basis for fees, and all regulatory environments. An effective SDM strategy logically originates with the customer, as the customer is most often the starting point in a service process. Accordingly, a utility has to be able to effectively manage all customer interactions. However, a typical utility will often take a narrow view of the customer service lifecycle, viewing customer service as something that occurs only in the call center. Such a perspective overlooks that the real opportunity for improvement for customer service is beyond the call center. For example, from the customer perspective, quality customer service is offering narrower appointment windows and providing guaranteed appointments. It is committing to work within a reasonable time frame and then actually performing the task when promised. And it is delivering electric, gas, or water service consistently without interruption or the need to reset clocks, re-ignite pilot lights, or use bottled water. Thus, CRM in the context of an SDM strategy would include a focus on the processes affecting all of the utility’s explicit or implied service level agreements – system reliability, billing accuracy, and completion of work when promised. Although very few utilities are able to meet today’s standards for high-quality service, customers are beginning to have even higher expectations for the future. Utilities are being forced to consider new service offerings, more demanding service level agreements, and more complex contracts. Today’s acceptable levels of performance won’t satisfy tomorrow’s customers. Any Work, Anywhere, Anybody The ability to manage all work types as part of a single logical service delivery network is a second cornerstone of a sound SDM strategy. This foundation permits a single view of all work that needs to be performed, a single record of the asset, its history, and maintenance strategy, and a single repository for resource skills. SDM takes a 360-degree view of all of the work activities to be performed and does away with the natural tendency to view work in silos. Thus, construction service, field service, maintenance service, and so on are considered based on the skills of the resources needed to do the work, the processes required to complete the work, and the dependencies for parts, equipment, and documentation. With this full-spectrum view of all the aspects of the work to be done, new strategies can be deployed to optimize the overall work process. For example, consider the nature of proactive maintenance activities. An effective SDM strategy would take advantage of other pending work tasks in close proximity to where maintenance work needs to be performed. However, doing so requires considerably more analysis and flexibility in determining how all the components of work are deployed than most utilities have today. More utilities are using third parties to execute all types of work. While this option promises to provide productive alternatives for accomplishing the tasks at hand, significant challenges result in determining what the best utilization of those resources would be. Should they be used for baseline work? Only overflow work? In what proportions? How will the utility know if third parties are complying with service level agreements? And, utilizing third parties creates a service network with its own complexity that must be managed. The information flows – both to and from the third party – must be managed so that the utility has as much visibility of the work’s status as when it is done by the utility’s regular employees. Operating in real time is another opportunity for utilities. Mobile and wireless technologies provide a tight linkage that allows the utility to communicate work to field personnel and to receive real-time status reports and updates. The speed at which the utility can react and understand the exact status of jobs is dramatically improved, and the cost to gain this ability continues to decline. However, studies show that less than 25 percent of the service organization is utilizing mobile technology for work. Ultimately, new options provide a great potential, but there is more complexity to manage in order to receive the highest benefit. ‘ True’ Resource Optimization The final essential capability of SDM is true resource optimization capabilities. How do we ensure that we are getting the right person, with the right skills, with the right parts, with the right information, to the right job, at the right time? Consider even a small problem of three resources and 24 jobs to perform. There are literally over 200 septillion potential ways to assign and address a problem of this magnitude. Despite the obvious complexity, the tools being used to aid in optimizing the problem are almost always manual or extremely rudimentary. However, the potential payoff from true resource optimization is enormous. A typical technician can spend less than 50 percent of his actual hours “on the job, able to work.” Many spend most of their time between work or arriving to find that things required to perform the critical elements of the job are missing, such as the right part, someone to provide access, etc. Increasing that percentage from 50 percent to 65 percent would be a 30 percent improvement in productivity. Efficiencies From Service Delivery Management Customer service representatives are able to make commitments to customer inquiries about when work will be performed or the status of work in progress. Customer calls are centralized in the call center rather than being routed to alternate points of entry in the utility for special handling (e.g., construction engineering) and are logged and dispositioned within a common contact management mechanism. As a result, the utility is able to see a complete view of customer attempts to have work performed, understand and analyze contact volumes and types, and design efficient contact strategies. The organization is able to effectively target communications to customers affected by work in an area (planned or unplanned) and to intercept calls to the call center. This ability eliminates customer frustration, as customer service representatives provide consistent answers and are able to answer questions about all aspects of the customer’s relationship with the utility. Work hand-offs are efficient and are tracked and escalated when not completed in a timely manner – preventing multiple calls from a customer for the same reason. Resource utilization is efficient and able to respond to work requirements based on skills, priority, and value to the utility. The organization is able to systematically ensure that work is performed to meet regulatory, safety, and design standards. Multiple ad hoc billing systems are eliminated even for special circumstances, preventing mistakes, time lags, inadequate follow-up, and credit risk. Meter assets are managed consistently with other assets, leveraging the supply chain, inventory management, testing, and compliance capabilities of a robust asset management system. Organization metrics are tracked, monitored, and analyzed, and there is easy access to information. What Stops Us? Historically, numerous environmental factors prevented utilities from achieving transformation. One, the systems necessary to support the information and business requirements for effective service delivery management did not exist. Systems were not process-aware in the context of the larger focus of the SDM business processes. For example, work management systems were fragmented and represented by single-purpose applications existing for each work type – one for field service, another for construction-oriented work, and yet another for managing inspections and maintenance activities. Finally, workforce management consisted primarily of using manual schedule boards and the optimization that Fred, Joe, or Tom was able to conjure on a particular day. Due to the overall complexity involved, organizational boundaries were historically set around groupings of like tasks and resources. So, not only are there information silos, there are organizational silos with each organization trying to optimize splintered parts of the organization’s overall business operations. Often, these organizations fail to talk to one another, and discussions are seldom initiated on how to achieve a better solution. Even if this were attempted, given the current state of most utility organizations and their underlying systems, the task would be insurmountable without a commitment to real change. The sheer complexity and cost of integrating the myriad existing systems would prove to be confusing, overwhelming, and impractical. This complexity continues to build as new tools and concepts emerge. Huge opportunities exist with mobile technology, third-party contractors, and differentiated service level agreements. However, without an SDM strategy, everyone focuses on their own myopic priorities, and the complexity of the environment and the barriers to transformation continue to grow and impede progress. It’s a Beginning SDM is an innovative approach to creating an effective management environment in the utility industry. This approach supports the operational excellence and transformation many utilities yearn for but have yet to achieve. Utilities must first determine if they are committed to making the changes in their organization, culture, and technology to achieve a different business result than they realize today. Those who are ready for SDM hold the keys for the utility of the future. Filed under: White Papers Tagged under: Utilities About the Author Chris Trayhorn, Publisher of mThink Blue Book Chris Trayhorn is the Chairman of the Performance Marketing Industry Blue Ribbon Panel and the CEO of mThink.com, a leading online and content marketing agency. He has founded four successful marketing companies in London and San Francisco in the last 15 years, and is currently the founder and publisher of Revenue+Performance magazine, the magazine of the performance marketing industry since 2002.