Update on Broadband Over Power Lines by Chris Trayhorn, Publisher of mThink Blue Book, May 15, 2006 Electric distribution utilities have come under increasing pressure to find innovative ways to improve efficiency and generate new revenue. With the deregulation of the electric power industry, separation of generation, transmission and distribution has put more emphasis on the stand-alone performance of distribution systems than in the past when electric utilities were more vertically integrated. Historically, distribution has accounted for 28 percent of the costs of delivering electricity, with generation and transmission accounting for 64 percent and 8 percent respectively.[1] Events such as the increasing congestion on transmission grids and the blackout of 2003 have focused attention on transmission. Meanwhile, distribution companies have been faced with the issues of aging infrastructure, loss of valuable knowledge and skills in the utility workforce due to retirement, increasing reliability and power quality issues, limited options to increase revenue and an increasing gap between customer expectations and the ability of the distribution utility to meet these demands, especially in the areas of local grid reliability and power quality. BPL Value Shift To meet each of these challenges, some electric utilities have turned to broadband over power lines (BPL). BPL makes use of digital signal processing technology to implement advanced modulation techniques capable of overcoming the severe shortcomings of electric distribution grids as communication media. BPL was originally touted as a way for the utility to generate new revenue from existing infrastructure by using the distribution wiring in conjunction with BPL to deliver broadband digital services such as Internet connectivity to consumers. While BPL was supposed to become a third alternative to digital cable and DSL for consumer broadband service delivery, the utility industry view of its value has shifted since its initial debut in the 1990s. The technology has gradually improved, but its deployment and operational complexity and costs have remained significant, and the business case for delivery of broadband services via power lines has not proven adequate to justify an electric utility venturing into an area removed from its core business. A number of electric utilities have carried out pilot projects with various BPL vendors, and some commercial ventures have been created to deliver consumer broadband services via BPL. But increasingly, electric utilities are seeing BPL as only one of many options to transport data for utility operations, especially in the context of an intelligent power grid. PPL Utilities Corp of Allentown, Pa., for example, cancelled its commercial BPL venture,[2] but CenterPoint Energy of Houston, Texas, is exploring the use of BPL to support core utility functions such as transporting electric meter data; supporting distributed sensors for grid monitoring and diagnosis; and aiding in automatic outage detection and localization.[3] In addition, the company is considering BPL as a mechanism to enable advanced energy delivery services such as time-of-day rate structures as well as off-peak usage discounting and remote energy management and load shedding. Positioning BPL Positioning BPL has proven to be a challenging proposition for electric utilities for several reasons. Electric utilities have traditionally been operated for reliability and long-term stability and their primary mission still centers on this concept. Utilities have therefore been uncomfortable with the degree of risk that comes with a new technology. In addition, after the spectacular implosion of the dot-com boom, new Internet-based business models (such as those associated with early BPL efforts) have been viewed as counter to the current back to basics trend in the electric utility industry. Furthermore, rapid changes in the technology have made it a moving target in terms of costs and performance, making analysis difficult. The intense competition in the broadband delivery industry has also been a significant concern, since the broadband provider concept would require the electric utility or a third party wishing to use utility BPL infrastructure, to compete against entrenched incumbents who have proven capable of increasing service speeds to levels not supportable by practical BPL implementations. These incumbents have made and are continuing to make large investments in infrastructure and new services and are well ahead of BPL in terms of market penetration. To date, there has been no utility industry consensus on standards or best practices for BPL implementation, and benefits associated with BPL are not well quantified. In many states, public utility commissions have set no definitive policy regarding rate relief for BPL investment, although Texas and California are exceptions. More than 20 communication technologies are available to carry digital data, and BPL must compete with them for use in intelligent grid data transport applications. In addition, many utilities have significant investment in legacy communication systems and are reluctant to invest in yet another communication infrastructure. Finally, radio amateurs have voiced strong opposition to BPL on the grounds that the technology causes interference in radio frequency bands used by amateurs, emergency services and government agencies. Nonetheless, BPL can be a winning technology because it is able to deliver modern network management capabilities and sufficient bandwidth to provide functionality for present applications while providing expansion capacity for future functions. BPL is still the subject of much research and development and, therefore, it is reasonable to assume that there will be improvements in the overall capabilities and costs of the technology, so that business cases will become easier to close as the technology matures. BPL can act as the data transport backbone for many core utility functions in the areas of grid state measurement, meter data transport, power quality and reliability measurement and monitoring, grid equipment state and health monitoring, outage and failure detection and localization, and safety and security applications. BPL is unique among broadband telecommunications technologies in that it is embedded in the power system infrastructure itself. This makes it the only data transport technology that can reach every electric utility asset on a distribution grid. While other technologies may be able to reach above-ground assets, only BPL provides a unified means to reach both above-ground and underground assets for communications purposes. Underground distribution poses an especially difficult problem for distributed sensing and control because the wireless technologies are essentially ineffective here. This feature becomes especially important as utilities extend asset management to include real-time asset monitoring and as utilities extend grid and device-state monitoring to improve system performance metrics such as SAIDI and SAIFI. The architecture of BPL systems is such that BPL devices not only provide data transport but are located ideally to make many of the key measurements that support full grid observability. For example, BPL devices, properly designed, could measure local AC voltage, current, and real and reactive power flow. They could sample the AC current and voltage waveforms and then compute displacement, distortion and total power factor as well as total harmonic distortion and total demand distortion. They could compute and monitor distribution transformer demand, including peaks, so that distribution transformer demand management could be carried out with confidence. They could perform signal analyses to detect and locate highimpedance faults. Existing BPL systems do not perform these functions and are not likely to until BPL manufacturers realize that the potential for BPL goes well beyond broadband communication. In addition, BPL could still become a conduit for the delivery of specialized broadband-based services for utility customers, including home automation and more flexible energy delivery rate plans (e.g., time-of-day demand, etc.). Business Transformation With BPL The embedded nature and broad coverage characteristics of BPL can open the door to a utility business transformation that goes well beyond the obvious benefits of simple automated meter reading and outage location applications. By increasing grid observability, the utility can change the fundamental way it performs basic business functions, from inventory management to strategic planning. The utility can move from the traditional focus on keeping the lights on to a focus on true business drivers: Delivery of high-quality power over a stable grid; Asset utilization optimization and asset life cycle management; Cost containment; Optimal asset replacement/upgrade and expansion; End-to-end power delivery chain integration; Infrastructure security; Ability to meet or exceed customer quality and performance expectations; and Facilitating the still-evolving digital ecosystem. Ultimately, BPL can become a key portion of a grid intelligence system that supports these business drivers by acting as the data transport layer (and possibly, to some extent, as a smart sensor) in intelligent power grid architecture. If we embed BPL as a data transport technology in the framework of an intelligent power grid (see Figure 1), we provide a context for determining its value. BPL is a unique telecommunications technology in that its intimate association with the power grid gives it the potential to act both as data transport and as a data source. Seeing BPL in this way, utility business analysts and strategic planners can balance its cost against the definable benefits of core utility functions enabled by BPL and examine the costs of BPL compared to alternate technologies. To perform a proper analysis, we must be careful to not only include the benefits of the applications enabled by BPL but also do a careful accounting of the various cost elements associated with BPL network deployment and operation. These include: Network design cost; Preliminary RF survey cost; BPL equipment costs; Head-end equipment costs; BPL equipment installation cost; BPL equipment installation project management cost; Post-installation RF survey and system-tuning costs; Backhaul communication installation cost; Network operations center cost; Backhaul monthly communication cost; Network management cost; Technical and help desk support cost; and Maintenance and system refresh costs. Network design costs can be significant for BPL. Network designers must learn the entire feeder system in the proposed BPL service area and identify solutions for dealing with distribution transformers, switches, reclosers, capacitors and other potential infrastructure impediments to proper BPL operation. It may be necessary to install additional optical fiber runs or wireless links to complete connectivity for the BPL network in some cases. These items may become apparent only after network architects have performed a design study. Since BPL deployments attract opposition from radio amateurs, it is prudent for the utility to allocate costs for outreach to the amateur radio community and plan for efforts to adjust the BPL system to notch out frequencies that would cause interference with radio systems in the BPL service area. The utility should perform and document a baseline RF survey before deploying BPL equipment. Once the utility has deployed the BPL equipment, it should repeat the RF survey and make any adjustments necessary to avoid interference problems. Involving the amateur radio community in these processes can smooth the introduction of BPL technology. Conclusion BPL is still an emerging technology with much to be done before it becomes a mainstream electric utility tool. Standards are just beginning to emerge, best practices are not yet defined and business cases are still inconclusive or remain to be validated by actual experience. We are now emerging from the peak of the hype cycle for BPL and are entering into a period of practical refinement and application. As long as utilities continue to focus BPL equipment vendors on issues of cost and functionality, standards and interoperability and robust performance, then BPL should continue to move toward its proper place as another tool for the electric utility to apply to its operations. Even though BPL is very unlikely to become a primary channel for delivery of broadband connectivity to consumers, it still may find a role as a carrier of broadband services to end users in areas where traditional providers do not offer workable or affordable options and may eventually prove to be a prime means of bringing specialized services to the home. It is clear, however, that BPLs greatest value will be as an enabler of intelligent grid functions that support the distribution utilitys core business. Endnotes U.S. Electric Utility Overview http://www.techadvantage.org/eprise/ main/TechAdvantage2005/NRECA/Overview.ppt End of Internet over Power Lines? testmy.net. October 16, 2005. http://www.testmy.net/articles/article-186 CenterPoint, IBM Roll out Smart Grid in Houston at http://www.leadingthecharge. com/stories/news-00137427.html and CenterPoint Energy and IBM examine innovative ways to use broadband over power line (BPL) technology at http://www.hoise.com/primeur/05/articles/weekly/AE-PR- 08-05-43.html Filed under: White Papers Tagged under: Utilities About the Author Chris Trayhorn, Publisher of mThink Blue Book Chris Trayhorn is the Chairman of the Performance Marketing Industry Blue Ribbon Panel and the CEO of mThink.com, a leading online and content marketing agency. He has founded four successful marketing companies in London and San Francisco in the last 15 years, and is currently the founder and publisher of Revenue+Performance magazine, the magazine of the performance marketing industry since 2002.