Impact of Re-Regulation on Utility Nuclear Generation by Chris Trayhorn, Publisher of mThink Blue Book, January 15, 2002 Business Drivers Some state regulators have already required their incumbent utilities to decide which line of business to pursue as they are forced to separate their generation, transmission/distribution and retail business units into regulated and non-regulated companies. Whether these utilities divest their nuclear generation units or continue to operate them as part of a separate company, they need to maximize the value of these assets to remain competitive in this new and open market. The long-term return on investment of these assets is imperative to their success. Key performance indicators for nuclear generation include the number of staff per unit, operating capacity of the unit vs. rating, cost per megawatt (fixed, fuel, operations, other), outage durations (compared to other comparable units), and radiation exposure. Internal Drivers The major cost component of nuclear energy is the capital depreciation cost per megawatt-hour. As a fixed cost, it rises per production unit if the productivity of the unit falls below forecasted levels. Any improvement in the ROI of a nuclear generating unit is, therefore, inexorably tied to maximizing the operating hours at the rated output (i.e., percent of maximum capacity the unit is authorized to operate) of that unit. This can be achieved by: minimizing the frequency and duration of forced outages (e.g., critical equipment failure), minimizing the duration of scheduled outages (e.g., re-fueling), protecting a unit’s permit to operate at full capacity, and optimizing the number of staff required to operate and maintain the unit. That is not to say that this should be done at any cost — the profitability of the unit is still linked to its operating budget as a whole. Achieving these performance measures must also be constrained by the level of resources budgeted for the effort. That budget must also result in a competitive price for the production units, while maintaining an acceptable profit level. Any increase in unit performance over the forecasted level will have significant impact on the unit’s profit, which will likely raise the expectation for future performance and hence the projected ROI of the unit and ultimately its market value. External drivers Federal and state regulators (such as NRC, OSHA, EPA, PUC) and independent “watch-dog” groups are primarily concerned with the safety of the general public and the employees who support the operation of the units. The unit’s “safe operation” must, therefore, be of paramount importance if these business objectives are to be achieved and the unit’s rating to be protected. Other critical success factors include: • Identifying critical components before failure • Maximizing the productivity of maintenance/operational staff during any outage • Creating and executing an effective preventive maintenance program, including mandated surveillances and inspections Once the management focus, culture, and discipline required to implement these supporting programs is in place, the next requirement is for business processes and systems infrastructure to align and optimize results, effectively managing utility systems for the foreseeable future. MySAP Utilities Work Management Solution SAP’s Product Life Cycle Management Solution provides all of the critical capabilities required to support the forementioned business objectives. SAP’s commitment to the utility industry ensures that the product will continue to offer new functionality, as the industry changes and evolves. The integrated nature of the SAP’s solution means that each SAP business function is “aware” and capable (out of the box) of referencing and impacting other related SAP business functions in real-time without the use of interfacing software. The following features of mySAP PLM directly address these work management requirements: • Deficiency reporting and tracking by technical component or structure (the analysis of breakdown, down time and cost to repair) • Powerful and flexible preventive maintenance capability • Work layout automation using variant configuration • Integrated work planning and scheduling • Integrated OSHA compliance • Lock-out/Tag-out for worker protection • Safe handling of hazardous material • Extensive work monitoring and management reporting • Flexible cost tracking and allocation schemes • Historical reporting of work, equipment movement, material usage, documents and business KPIs MySAP Utilities Work Management solution is used in power plants by over 500 utilities worldwide, including more than 100 plants in North America. SAP’s nuclear generating customers using mySAP Utilities Work Management solution include PSE&G & NPPD in North America; VSE, Vattenfall-Ringhals, Iberdrola & Electrabel in Europe; TUAS Power & CS Energy in Asia-Pacific. Plant Shutdown Work Management One of the critical activities supported by SAP’s solution is the scheduling of work related to a plant shutdown. However, most utilities still use a stand-alone project planning tool for this task. These “best-of-breed” applications do not have real-time access to staff, tool or material availability. As a result, either scheduled work cannot be performed during the shutdown or the duration of the shutdown is extended to permit the rescheduling of this critical work. Less-than-optimal scheduling means that non-critical remedial maintenance, preventive maintenance and inspection work is never scheduled or assigned to a crew unable to execute it on time. The lack of accurate, real-time feedback information about the work also disguises the true problem. Is it poor planning, poor scheduling or poor execution that jeopardizes the success of the shutdown? Figure 1 – Work Clearance Management: Work protection documents are linked to the actual maintenance work order. The integrated nature of the mySAP Utilities Work Management solution supports all of the necessary business functions while maintaining a current, complete and correct view of all resources, work in progress and work safety, under one umbrella. Business Process Model for Plant Shutdown Before looking at the components of mySAP Utilities Work Management Solution, which fully supports plant shutdown/turnarounds, let us first review the business processes that such a solution must sustain. Using the eight-step approach defined by the SAP Plant Maintenance User Group in a Plant Maintenance Shutdown/Turnaround White-paper issued in July 1999, the key business processes were defined as: • Work Identification and Selection • Planning and Budgeting • Scheduling and Capacity Planning • Planning Approval and Release of Plan • Work Execution and Feedback • Management of Emerging work • Completion of work • Analysis of work results See Larger Image Figure 2 – Hierarchical graphical representation of the building blocks of an SAP project, including WBS elements, work orders and spares. The objectives (deliverables) and pre-conditions or characteristics of SAP’s world-class solution are examined below: Work Identification and Selection The objective of this step in the process is to provide a series of work requests that identify all candidates for work, whether part of the formal shutdown plan template, preventive maintenance work (either due or requiring a shutdown), surveillances, inspections, remedial maintenance or any other work that is either time- or operationally-qualified for consideration. MySAP Utilities Work Management solution can create work requests from automatically triggered preventive maintenance plans (based on elapsed time, equipment counter/condition or both), from surveillance/inspection lists, from externally triggered events (such as SCADA systems), as well as manually generated requests. SAP provides sophisticated selection and review tools that provide a means for planners to assign the appropriate work requests to a weekly maintenance window within the shutdown. This selection and assignment process will repeat itself throughout the shutdown planning and execution steps as additional critical work arises. Planning and Budgeting Once the preliminary candidates for work within the shutdown windows have been identified, detailed planning of work and the necessary labor, materials, services, and tools must be performed. The result of this step will be the detailed definition of the resources and work-step dependencies required to execute each work request as well as the expected cost associated with that work. Various tools are provided in mySAP Utilities Work Management to facilitate quick and easy work layout, especially repetitive tasks with many variations. MySAP Utilities Work Management solution ensures that material availability is considered very early in the planning cycle. Some work may be shifted or even dropped from the plan if the necessary material cannot be provided in time. SAP’s world-class Supply Chain Management solution is a key under-pinning to the Work Management system. The integration, vendor-control and ability to reserve and yet see stock levels in all company storage areas maximizes the effective use of spares and tools. The earlier this step is executed the better the opportunity to expedite material delivery. Critical material can also be reserved into “project-stock” to avoid its inadvertent use for other less critical work. SAP’s Quality Management functionality ensures that regulatory sourcing requirements are met, and Q-level plant conditions are maintained. The resulting work plan represents a series of weekly work schedules merged into an overall shutdown plan. The master outage plan will most likely be created from one or more templates that have been adjusted to fit the unique objectives and requirements of this particular shutdown. In addition, mySAP Utilities Work Clearance Management functionality (including links to the external radiation tracking system) ensures that the details of the work protection required as a condition of safe work execution are defined. These OSHA-compliant lock-out/tag-out procedures are integrated with the actual planned maintenance work orders. Scheduling and Capacity Planning Shutdown/turnaround work may be planned as an operating project utilizing critical path analysis, reconciling float across windows of time in a hierarchical structure enabled by the seamless integration of the project systems module and the plant maintenance module. A planned turnaround uses all of these integrated tools to plan, report, execute, close and analyze the operating maintenance project against the maintenance budget. An emergency shutdown uses those tools best suited to plan and execute work in a timely manner, with follow-up rescheduling of backlog work (online or turnaround), where resources were re-allocated to the emergency shutdown. The reality of finite, qualified and available staff (either internal or external to the company) to execute the planned work must be considered. The scheduling of this “interim master plan” will produce for each crew or groups of crews, a resource loading demand that must be compared to its capacity and capability. Any shortfall or surplus in capacity or capability (i.e., available hours of work and skills or qualifications to do that work) must be considered in developing the “master plan,” which will be submitted for approval and eventual execution. SAP provides rough-cut capacity planning tools for evaluating and rescheduling resource overload, as well as a fully automated, finite leveling capability for rescheduling mass orders to available capacity. MySAP Utilities Work Management Solution provides integration with SAP’s world-class Human Capital Management functionality to ensure that only qualified crews or individuals are assigned to work that requires special skills. The work schedules of these individuals are available to the Work Management solution, ensuring that the most current and accurate availability and qualifications information is used in preparing the detailed work assignments. The work required by operations staff to execute the work protection activities can also be assigned at his time. Additionally, better control of work assignments and their sequencing may result in the reduction of radiation exposure to employees. Approval and Release of Plan The ‘master plan’ that has been prepared and submitted for approval includes the work plan, the resource plan and the budget plan. Based on the business unit’s operations budget constraints, this plan may be modified before it is approved. Approval would typically result in the release of all or a portion of the budget required in order to move forward with the plan. The approved plan is then saved to form the baseline against which the actual results will be measured. The established baseline incorporates costs, resource quantities, dates and times on a step-by-step basis, with rollup capability. The Release of Schedule could result in the isolation of material into project stock, the communication of the plans to the maintenance and operations units involved and the beginning of preparatory work required to execute the plan once the actual shutdown takes place. The integration of mySAP Utilities Work Management solution with SAP’s world-class Financial Capital Management functionality ensures that the appropriate allocation of the planned and actual costs to capital assets or to operations accounts is supported. In cases where FERC reporting is required, mySAP Utilities also provides IS-U/FERC to meet regulatory reporting requirements. Work Execution and Feedback As shutdown work proceeds, it is critical to the successful management of this effort that current, complete and correct reporting of work activity be available to the planners and schedulers. To achieve this result, all work including maintenance and safety, material usage, tool usage and contractor services must be reported in a timely fashion (typically at the end of each shift/day). SAP’s solution offers timely reporting with superior functionality supporting the entry of confirmations via the Internet. To ensure outage schedule compliance, the “working plan” will be updated to reflect remaining work and then rescheduled based on the latest available capacity for qualified resources. Changes to the plan will be communicated to affected staff and management. Prior to updating the working plan for the remaining work a new baseline is obtained. SAP supports multiple baseline versions for different work stages, if needed. Each baseline can be automatically compared to others as well as the current version of the project, with a step-by-step calculation of variances, and rollup capability. Management of New Work In reality, new unapproved work will be identified after the initial approval, release and execution of the working plan. Based on management controls in place for this project, these “new work” requests must be presented to appropriate management for approval and incorporation into the working plan. The use of workflow is supported within mySAP Utilities Work Management solution to facilitate the automatic flow of work requests from the identification phase through planning and finally to approval/rejection. MySAP Utilities Work Management also supports the analysis of these processes for elimination of bottlenecks. These approved additions to the working plan are included in the next re-scheduling exercise in the same manner that actual results drive adjustments to the current plan. Appropriate costs and durations are automatically recalculated. Work Completion All activity associated with the shutdown must be completed and records updated to reflect the work done, as well as the final facility status. The work includes final confirmations, applying the correct status to each job, removing all safety tags, post-maintenance testing, updating documentation, releasing of dedicated staff, processing all outstanding invoices, returning unused material and tools, cost settlement and root-cause analysis where required. Work Results Analysis In order to ensure that the organization learns from each shutdown, it is imperative that defined metrics are calculated for both planned/approved values and for actual results. MySAP Utilities Work Management provides extensive analytical and reporting tools to support KPI measures and the investigation of deviations so that the template plan can be approved accordingly. This analysis will help to drive improvements in the shutdown template plan as well as identify opportunities for improving the planning, scheduling and execution phases of future shutdowns. MySAP Utilities Work Management solution results in shorter outages, fewer maintenance staff and a higher level of reliability and safety than can be achieved with a loosely linked set of stand-alone applications. Improved performance translates to higher return on investment for the unit, and therefore the asset. Summary Any utility considering improvement in their nuclear generation business unit should consider the opportunities offered by mySAP Utilities. SAP’s 29-year history of success, impressive list of satisfied customers, innovative technology and long-term commitment to the utility industry clearly illustrates that SAP is a world-class solution for utilities today and is committed and capable of answering utilities’ specific pain points and requirements well into the future. Filed under: White Papers Tagged under: Utilities About the Author Chris Trayhorn, Publisher of mThink Blue Book Chris Trayhorn is the Chairman of the Performance Marketing Industry Blue Ribbon Panel and the CEO of mThink.com, a leading online and content marketing agency. He has founded four successful marketing companies in London and San Francisco in the last 15 years, and is currently the founder and publisher of Revenue+Performance magazine, the magazine of the performance marketing industry since 2002.