With Deregulation and Competition, Energy Companies Embrace EBPP as an Effective CRM Tool by Chris Trayhorn, Publisher of mThink Blue Book, November 15, 2000 Deregulation and Billing While customers in deregulated utility markets face a barrage of marketing materials from new entrants into the marketplace and comprehensive educational programs sponsored by utility commissions, industry trade groups, and incumbent companies, their most significant source of information on deregulation is likely to be their monthly bill. When the direct mail and advertising programs end, customers will look to their bills to determine if a switch to a new supplier translated into any significant savings. Customers make that evaluation – and future choices – based on a comparison of what they’ve paid for utility services in the past and what they are paying under deregulation. For that reason, monthly billing statements will take on a whole new role from a simple statement of usage, cost per unit, and amount due to a tool that can be used to manage business and personal financial decisions that could include a choice of supplier or options that could reduce utility costs. Additionally, deregulation will increase the complexity of the bill itself. A bill that had a single cost and single amount due in a monopoly market will now add additional categories to reflect the products and services available competitively. For local distribution companies, billing and payment may also mean billing for a wholesale supplier, as well as collecting and forwarding payments to that supplier. Above all, even in markets saturated with advertising, direct marketing, and public information campaigns, deregulation has brought uncertainty and questions from customers. The monthly billing statement is often either the place where customers look for information and communication or the document that sparks questions and requests for information from customers. The traditional paper bill and enclosures have an extremely limited ability to address the issues raised by deregulation, but new technologies are giving utilities the ability to revolutionize their bill presentment and payment processes while building stronger customer relationships and customer loyalty. EBPP – What Is It? Simply stated, EBPP – Electronic Bill Presentment and Payment – is the presentment of bills to consumers and the processing of bill payments over the Internet. Today, EBPP describes a broad array of technologies and services that range from the simple scanning and electronic transmission of a paper bill image to more sophisticated electronic billing services that permit customers to sort and analyze data and offer online, telephone, or autodebit payment options. The key to the growing popularity of EBPP is the ability to transform the information available in the traditional paper bill into a management tool that can equip businesses and individuals with the ability to analyze costs and operations and make decisions that can significantly reduce expenditures. For example, an EBPP solution developed by Princeton eCom for Verizon Wireless, provides Verizon customers with a cellular bill that can be sorted according to several formats, including the time of day calls are made, calls to a single location, etc. Usage analysis is another tool available to Verizon customers, where they can analyze their usage by several criteria. Now a static bill becomes an analysis tool. A business manager or an individual consumer using the Verizon electronic bill could make educated decisions on their calling plan or their long distance carrier based on how they or their company’s employees were using their cellular phone. For utility companies, the potential for analysis in deregulated markets may be limitless as customers could make comparisons over usage times, times of day, and supplier costs in order to determine if they had made the correct plan choices. EBPP and Deregulation The first and most significant impact of EBPP in a deregulated market is enjoyed by the incumbent utility because electronic billing services mean more effective, more efficient, and less costly billing processes. Industry estimates place the cost of producing and sending a paper bill at approximately $1.25 per bill. The cost of an electronic bill is estimated at about 40 cents per bill. Companies that adopt electronic billing could cut the costs of their billing operation by as much as half or two-thirds. According to a study by Killen & Associates, the U.S. utility industry can save $1.2 billion per year by implementing electronic bill presentment and payment. In addition to the savings that result from lower costs of producing and sending the bills themselves, companies will also reduce costs by translating the enclosures that accompany bills today into electronic marketing tools and eliminating the high costs of printing and increased postage required to send printed material. For regulatory commissioners, who relied on the small print on the back of the bill and bill enclosures to communicate regulations with the public, and for companies required to communicate regulatory information, the translation of printed material into online communications has some additional advantages. Customers could be required to acknowledge their receipt of regulatory conditions or information with a click of the mouse in much the same way as they indicate acceptance of the terms and conditions of the software they download or install in their computers. At the same time, the customers who pay bills online also receive the benefit of convenience and time savings, not to mention the costs of postage for sending payment. EBPP also offers companies more efficient and effective operations on the accounts receivable side of the business. By their very nature, electronic payments are more efficient and faster than paper bills. The traditional billing process involves creating and sending a bill in the mail, having the customer receive it, read it, write a check, and then mail the check back to the company. At any stage of the process, a delay on the part of an individual or the postal service, means delayed payment. In electronic bill presentment and payment, the bill arrives electronically, the individual selects a payment option, and the payment is processed. No mail delays, no lost paper bills somewhere on the kitchen counter. Two other services offered by some EBPP providers also speed payment and increase cash flow. The electronic lockbox increases the accuracy of bill processing and posting by eliminating the most common exception items. An electronic collection service streamlines the traditional collection agency process by automatically debiting a customer’s checking account or drawing from a credit card. EBPP and Competition The competitive stakes in utility deregulation are high. More than one-third of the respondents in a recent survey said they would absolutely switch providers for a 10% price discount. That’s not good news for traditional utilities, whose cost structure often reflects the high expense of large operations like billing, that come face-to-face with non-traditional entrants who don’t have large overhead and are looking for new and innovative ways to break into the marketplace and attract customers. Adoption of electronic billing by the incumbent utility not only helps to reduce costs and improve operational efficiency, it also helps to put a more up-to-date face on the traditional company and to meet its competitors toe-to-toe on the competitive battlefield. Moreover, it eliminates the competitive advantage that a competitor could claim by introducing EBPP and provides another reason for customers to “stay home” with the company they’ve known for years. Adopting an EBPP Strategy Utilities need to adopt an EBPP strategy now. While overall adoption rates for electronic billing are currently low – an estimated 5 percent of all utility commerce was conducted online in 1999 – it’s anticipated that 30% of utility customers will either use the Internet to pay bills or make customer service contacts over the next few years. Experience tells us that adoption grows more significantly when companies implement a billing system that provides value in terms of content and the ability to sort and analyze data, and easily and quickly initiate payment. In today’s competitive marketplace, an initial EBPP strategy should take several factors into consideration. Cost. The cost of investing in an EBPP solution is likely to drive a number of related decisions. These include deciding on whether to build a proprietary system at a cost of more than a million, outsourcing the total EBPP process for as little as $30,000, or licensing an EBPP solution and paying ongoing maintenance costs, which can cost several hundreds of thousands of dollars. Branding. The EBPP implementation should support and reinforce the company’s brand image, in terms of the obvious prominence of the biller’s logo on the bill to offerings that reflect the company’s core competencies. Systems Integration. An EBPP solution should help solve financial challenges – not create new ones. A system that does not integrate with existing billing and financial systems is likely to be cost prohibitive. CRM Interface. Viewing EBPP as only a means to send bills and collect money limits its power and overlooks its most important value – its ability to build a strong Customer Relationship Management platform into and on top of the electronic billing process. Ushering in a New Era in CRM While streamlining the billing and payments process and increasing the accuracy and speed of payments are powerful reasons to implement an electronic billing and payment solution, the real promise of EBPP lies in its ability to revolutionize utility CRM operations. By marrying billing and information technologies, EBPP has the potential to turn a monthly billing statement – often the only point of contact between utility companies and their customers – into a powerful tool to increase customer satisfaction and build all-important customer loyalty. By using the information imbedded in a customer’s bill as the basis of an analysis, the company produces targeted, personalized messages that position it as a concerned partner interested in helping and empowering individual customers to make smart business decisions. As an example, if the analysis of a customer’s energy bill shows a sudden and significant increase in energy usage that occurs at the start of a winter season, that information could generate a message offering a free energy audit or information about the utility’s equipment maintenance and repair service. In this case, the offers are not merely seasonal marketing promotions received by every customer, but messages targeted to and reflecting the individual customer’s energy usage and bill. Or, if an analysis of a business’s electricity bill shows most usage occurring in the high-cost prime time hours, it might generate a suggestion to cut costs by switching at least some operations to the less expensive night hours and provide a cost-analysis of savings. Beyond information and analysis resulting from an indivdual customer’s usage, the utility bill of the future is likely to provide more significant and valid comparisons and to draw more informed conclusions. For example, a future natural gas bill might contain comparisons with other natural gas users in a neighborhood, housing development, or zip code. This would enable customers to determine if their gas usage is out of line with neighbors or just the result of abnormally high or low temperatures. By providing more detailed information and comparisons in billing statements as well as related links, it’s likely that companies can eventually reduce more expensive call center operations. Redefining Customer Service Online billing is also expected to redefine the way in which customers interact with utility companies on routine requests for service or service changes. It stands to reason that fewer and fewer customers will accept waiting on the telephone for a customer service representative when they can conduct routine business and make routine purchases as fast as a mouse click. For that reason, it’s very likely that successful utilities will incorporate routine service and billing change requests into their EBPP solution. Rather than holding on the line waiting for the next available operator, customers will have an online ability to change addresses and arrange for service, and schedule routine maintenance visits online. As an added advantage, incorporating routine service requests into the EBPP solution also places that information into the company’s billing system. Experience-Based Marketing In deregulated markets, incumbent often find themselves attempting to build their competitive position by marketing new and higher margin products and services under their familiar brand name. Electronic billing makes it possible for the companies to cross-sell and up-sell products and services more efficiently and effectively by targeting offers to customers based on their current billing experience as well as the demographic and financial information. Differentiation – Content is a Competitive Advantage When the World Wide Web experienced its explosive growth in the mid-1990s, companies differentiated themselves from competitors merely by having a presence on the Web. Eventually, however, customers began to differentiate competitors and give their loyalty to companies whose websites offered them the utility and interaction they expected. Today, companies can distinguish themselves from competitors by merely offering electronic bill presentment and payment services. But not for long. As more and more companies find that EBPP is no longer an option, but a requirement, customers will make decisions about them based on what their EBPP solution contains and whether it offers the content or options they expect. The companies whose EBPP solutions offer the most content, the most features, and the most targeted messages will find themselves holding a significant competitive advantage. Filed under: White Papers Tagged under: Utilities About the Author Chris Trayhorn, Publisher of mThink Blue Book Chris Trayhorn is the Chairman of the Performance Marketing Industry Blue Ribbon Panel and the CEO of mThink.com, a leading online and content marketing agency. He has founded four successful marketing companies in London and San Francisco in the last 15 years, and is currently the founder and publisher of Revenue+Performance magazine, the magazine of the performance marketing industry since 2002.